?
- Anonymous
- baby
I remember my AMD 64 X2 from around 2005, which I bought in early 2007 since the prices finally came down. A 90nm set, but at the time of its release was considered one of the most powerful and efficient desktop processors in its class.
?
- Anonymous
- 3SI
Koishi Komeiji, 29 minutes agoimagine a 1nm processor. too small for nanoscale manufacturingAfter 2nm there will be 1.4nm and maybe less than 1nm, but take those numbers with a grain of salt as this is all a bit marketing. For example, Intels 14nm+++ are similar to TSMC 7nm.
Koishi Komeiji, 29 minutes agoimagine a 1nm processor. too small for nanoscale manufacturingand more efficient and faster too.
you must be in pain, 1 hour agoit decreases over time. breaking Moore’s law.imagine a 1nm processor. too small for nanoscale manufacturing
D
- denis1991
- sw3
This chip will be the beast.
R
3nm…
I remember when it was said that my Pentium D Desktop was very efficient and wouldn’t add much to the electric bill even if you used it more than 4-5 hours a day. It was also said to run cooler and didn’t need air conditioning. It was 65nm lol.
it decreases over time. breaking Moore’s law.
More Stories
Delay in mass production of new Intel products is a boon for AMD, share of AMD x86 server processors expected to exceed 22% in 2023, according to TrendForce
Quantum industry milestone brings mass production of quantum chips closer
NEO Battery Materials provides updates on installation of additional equipment for mass production optimization and final stages of commercial plant design for construction